|
|
![]() |
|
Some Topical Secondary Sources — Useful for Getting Started
For the content of your Episodes, these secondary sources often provide very helpful background and context, although they do not qualify as reliable professional secondary sources (see "Evaluating Online Resources"). For example, my favorite online encyclopedia, Wikipedia, is not a reliable professional source for research -- it is great for gaining background knowledge and for quick reference. I love Wikipedia, and my web pages have links to Wikipedia all over the place. But gaining a context of background knowledge is different from doing research. For research, the secondary source you rely upon must have direct knowledge of the primary sources. Wikipedia and many of the other secondary sources listed below, therefore, may help you conceptualize your research and help you to frame interesting questions, but they do not count as reliable professional secondary sources unless they fulfill the criteria explained on the evaluating resources page. Although you are encouraged to use them and to cite them in your episodes, they may not fulfill the requirement of engaging the professional literature of the history of science, and it would be wise to independently verify everything you take from them that is central to your project.
These websites just scratch the surface! Please submit your recommended websites
in the Confluence forum!!!
HSCI 3013. History
of Science to 17th century |
spellcheck.net | wordcounter.net
Many thanks to the pedagogical model developed in Mythology and Folklore and other online courses by Laura Gibbs, which have been an inspiration for this course.
|
||
This course is currently undergoing major reconstruction to bring it into alignment with the new version of the course at Janux |
|||